Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.K. Lundblad's avatar

Nice work Tahra

There are so many ways in which the cost of living is quietly inflated by rules and regulations passed under the guise of “safety and security.”

Oddly enough, most of these measures don’t work at all. As I wrote:

The precautionary principle is spreading into the workplace as well. In 1950, just 5% of American jobs required a license to perform them; today 30% do. This is due, in part, to a shift in the American labor force away from low-skilled manufacturing and toward high-skilled services. It’s also a function, however, of overzealous state regulators and lobbying by professional groups under the specious guise of “safety and health.” Studies examining the effects of occupational licensing have not found any discernible health/safety benefits. For example, Kleiner and Kudrle found no correlation between the difficulty of passing a dental license exam and the quality of dentistry. Similarly, studies have found that more stringent licensing of mortgage brokers does not result in fewer foreclosures.

Shravan Bhat's avatar

Great article! Do you know if highly-regulated places like NYC/DC get fewer accidents/injuries than Texas/Maryland because of their stricter laws?

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?