6 Comments
User's avatar
David Muccigrosso's avatar

One more thing is that construction jobs are traditionally male. By not building, we’ve destroyed several generations worth of such jobs.

Expand full comment
C.C.'s avatar

The problem with this argument is that the issues Dems speak to women about are unambiguously women's issues, and when you propose talking about issues like housing and childcare (come on) as men's issues specifically, you unavoidably imply that these challenges are easier for women. What's the actual proposal you're making? Ads about how men shouldn't feel bad about not being able to be providers in the face of these challenges?

Expand full comment
Jon Spearman's avatar

I’d say Gary is arguing that Dems should more directly speak to men about these specific issues, in this way, because they’re the ones that greatly affect men. Not that they can’t talk about these issues to women or in general in a different frame, but when speaking to and persuading male voters, Dems should frame their message closer to this manner

Expand full comment
C.C.'s avatar

But what does that mean, practically? I’ve read this exact article dozens of times with slight variations and there is never anything actionable in them. Ads? Speeches? Campaigns? Proposals of law?

Expand full comment
Gary Winslett's avatar

There are a number of actionable items here. https://bringcostsdown.org/

Expand full comment
C.C.'s avatar

Yes, there are, but they aren’t rhetorically tailored to men or boys so again I ask you what exactly you’re asking for in this article.

Expand full comment